
from chinese-copyright-application-skill62
Generate complete Chinese software copyright application materials (application form, code documentation, user manual, design docs) and export them to PDF from
This skill automates creation of Chinese software copyright application materials from a codebase and its documentation. It extracts project metadata (name, version, authors), produces a formatted application form, standardized source-code documentation (split into front/back sections), a user manual, and a design specification — then outputs Markdown and PDF files ready for submission.
Use when preparing a software copyright filing in China or when you need standardized legal and technical documentation for release: small apps, WeChat mini-programs, web apps, mobile apps, or desktop software. Ideal for projects that need quick, consistent paperwork generation from existing repo files (package.json, README, config files).
copyright-application-materials/ and converted to PDF.Best used with code-aware agents that can inspect repos and run local scripts or file extraction steps (Copilot/Codex/Gemini-like agents). The skill assumes access to the repository files and the ability to read package/config files.
This skill generates Chinese software copyright application materials (application forms, source code docs, user manuals, design docs) from a project directory. The bundled Python script has a SyntaxError on line 361 (malformed f-string with mismatched quotes) that prevents it from running at all. Beyond the syntax bug, the code is a single monolithic ~400-line class with minimal error handling (bare except clauses, no input validation) and large sections of hardcoded boilerplate template text. Security is clean — no network calls, no credentials, purely local file I/O.
The skill targets a real but niche need (Chinese software copyright filings). The SKILL.md itself is well-written with clear steps and template references. The fatal syntax error in the script suggests it was not tested before publishing. With the bug fixed, the script would work but produces fairly generic/boilerplate output — the design doc and user manual sections are mostly placeholder text. The source code document generator is the most substantive part. Score penalized heavily for the script being non-functional due to syntax error.