
from openagentscontrol3,976
Automated code review guidance focusing on security, correctness, and maintainability; used to validate changes before committing.
This skill provides a structured, standards-driven code review workflow for AI agents. It instructs the agent to preload project coding and security standards, run a targeted file or diff review, and return findings organized by severity (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW) with concrete diffs and remediation steps. The skill emphasizes security and blocks commits on critical or high-severity issues.
Use this skill when code has been written and needs validation before committing or when a user explicitly requests a security or quality review of files, diff ranges, or feature branches. Ideal for pre-merge checks and automated CI review agents.
/code-review against files or diffs, analyze and structure findings, and prescribe fixes including patch diffs. Guidance on when to stop, fix, and re-run.Best suited for agent setups that support isolated reviewer subagents and file-level invocation (e.g., Claude Code or similar code-reviewer agents).
A purely instructional code-review skill with no bundled scripts. Provides a well-structured framework for security/correctness/style reviews with severity levels and a subagent invocation pattern. Relies on external context files (.opencode/context/core/standards/) that aren't bundled, making it incomplete standalone. Specific to the OpenAgentsControl framework's fork context pattern.
Clean skill with no security concerns. Well-written instructions but essentially a structured prompt template rather than an automated tool. Missing the referenced standards files makes it incomplete without the parent repo context. The 'common rationalizations' table is a nice touch for encouraging review discipline.