Resolve Dispute structures a facilitator-led, put-up-or-concede exchange to close stuck review findings. It provides a short, enforceable three-step process: frame the dispute, send a single-evidence request to the reviewer, then rule and tag the finding DECIDED. The goal is to prevent repeated re-raising of previously arbitrated points without new substance.
Use when a review finding has survived prior arbitration but lacks new evidence, during code reviews or post-mortem discussions where a facilitator must restore progress and finality. Not for initial disagreements or when substantive evidence exists.
Best for workflow and coordination agents that manage review processes and messaging (Claude Code, task-runner agents, human-in-the-loop facilitators).
resolve-dispute is a pure-procedure skill (no scripts) that defines a 3-step facilitation workflow for resolving stuck code review findings via a put-up-or-concede exchange. It's well-structured with clear steps and explicit boundaries (what it must not do), but targets a niche audience within the Swarms framework.
No scripts to evaluate. Pure markdown procedure skill. Frontmatter present and complete. User-invocable is set to false, meaning it's triggered internally by the facilitator role. Niche use case limited to code review dispute workflows.