This skill runs an adversarial, three-agent code review pipeline: a Hunter (maximize recall to find potential bugs), a Skeptic (challenge and attempt to disprove findings with risk-adjusted scoring), and a Referee (independently adjudicate and produce a definitive report). The design enforces strict context boundaries so each phase analyses code independently, reducing confirmation bias and producing high-fidelity bug reports with structured BUG-IDs and severity scoring.
Use for pre-merge security audits, large PR reviews, legacy code audits, or any high-stakes module where false negatives are costly. It supports scanning entire projects, directories, individual files, or branch-diff mode (files changed between branches).
Agents that can spawn isolated subagents, read code, and pass structured data between phases (e.g., orchestration-capable assistants or platforms supporting isolated runtimes).
Three-phase adversarial code review skill (Hunter/Skeptic/Referee) with isolated agent contexts to eliminate sycophancy bias. No bundled scripts — pure prompt orchestration. Well-documented with clear execution protocol, scoring systems, and structured output format. Niche but well-designed for teams doing serious code review.
Clean skill with no security concerns. The isolated-context design pattern is thoughtful and well-articulated. No executable code to test.
Remind — Conversation Recall
Search and recall past Claude Code/agent conversation sessions to find decisions, code snippets, and context for continuation or reference.
Humanize
Revision and editing rules to remove AI-like patterns from prose so output reads more natural and human — applied automatically to any human-facing text before
Runtime Context
Detects which execution environment an agent is running in (Claude Code, Vercel Sandbox, or local dev) and exposes available tools and capabilities for safe, en