
from medical-research-skills1,115
Perform structured methodological quality assessments of research papers (RCTs, observational studies, systematic reviews) and produce a reproducible evaluation
This skill automates critical appraisal of research articles by mapping study designs to appropriate quality-check tools, extracting text from PDFs when needed, and synthesizing a structured assessment report. It supports multiple study types (RCTs, cohort, case-control, diagnostic accuracy, qualitative, systematic reviews) and encodes deterministic output rules to keep deliverables consistent. The packaged helper scripts assist with PDF extraction and standardized output generation.
Use when you need a repeatable, checklist-driven quality appraisal: preparing evidence tables for reviews, validating study internal validity, or producing reviewer-ready assessment summaries. Require the source article (text or PDF) and clear task parameters (which tool/checklist to apply). Do not use for speculative clinical advice or when source documents are missing.
references/.quality_assessment_result.md with a validation summary and assumptions. The SKILL.md specifies input validation and failure handling rules.Compatible with Python-capable agents and research assistants that can validate inputs, run helper scripts, and post-process structured markdown output.
This skill has not been reviewed by our automated audit pipeline yet.
Plotly (Interactive Python Visualizations)
Interactive Python visualization skill for building hoverable, zoomable, and embeddable charts (Plotly Express + Graph Objects) for EDA, dashboards, and present
Scite Database (Smart Citations)
Query Scite.ai Smart Citations by DOI to report supporting, contrasting, and mentioning citation counts and help assess a paper's reliability.
Scite Database
Fetch and summarize Scite.ai Smart Citations for a DOI to classify supporting, contrasting, and mentioning citations and assess a paper's reception.
Medical English Precision Editor
Preserves scientific meaning while improving medical English precision, clarity, flow, and journal-appropriate tone.
Peer Review (Academic)
Produce structured, actionable peer review reports for manuscripts, theses, and internal research outputs, separating major validity issues from minor polish it