
from medical-research-skills349
Query Scite.ai Smart Citations by DOI to report supporting, contrasting, and mentioning citation counts and help assess a paper's reliability.
Provides a packaged CLI and script-based skill for querying Scite.ai smart citations for a given DOI. Returns aggregate counts of supporting, contrasting, and mentioning citations, plus optional JSON output for pipelines. Includes a documented scripts/scite_client.py entrypoint for automated runs.
Use when evaluating the reception of a scientific paper: quick reliability checks, prioritizing literature for review, fact-checking claims, or comparing citation sentiment profiles across papers. Prefer the script path when automated, reproducible outputs are needed.
Inferred compatibility: Python-enabled agents and runners that can execute repository scripts (Codex/Code-compatible agents).
Scite Database skill queries Scite.ai Smart Citations by DOI to report supporting/contrasting/mentioning citation counts. No scripts were present and the SKILL.md body was null/missing from the database and the GitHub source returned 404, so full static analysis was not possible. Scored conservatively based on available metadata and description only.
SKILL.md body is null in DB and GitHub source URL returns 404. The skill likely relies on an external Scite.ai API (requiring an API key) but without the skill body we cannot verify security posture, instruction quality, or architecture. Quality and architecture scores are low due to missing content. Security scored conservatively at 90 — no scripts to analyze and no obvious red flags in metadata, but null body means we can't confirm absence of issues. The skill may need to be re-fetched or removed if source is permanently unavailable.