China Lawyer Analyst

What it does

This skill provides structured legal analysis from the perspective of Chinese law. It automates a three-phase workflow: Phase 1 — initial analysis (IRAC + 10-step method and case-type identification), Phase 2 — automated legal verification (checks statutes, judicial interpretations, and versioning), and Phase 3 — reflection and correction (updates citations and re-runs analysis). It includes a dynamic judicial-interpretation index to load only the necessary statutory commentary, reducing token and compute costs while preserving accuracy. Outputs include a structured opinion, a six-part requirements checklist, and a verification report.

When to use it

Use when you need rapid, citation-aware legal analysis for Chinese law issues such as contract disputes, tort claims, company law questions, construction disputes, investment/financing issues, labor law, IP, or litigation/ arbitration scenarios. Ideal when accuracy against law versions matters (e.g., check whether a statute was amended) or when you want a reproducible, checklist-driven legal opinion.

What's included

• Scripts: none packaged in repo (has_scripts=false) but many tools referenced (case_identifier, checklist_generator, automated_verification).
• References: documented indices and interpretation modules (dynamic index system).
• Instructions: detailed workflow for the three-phase analysis and routing logic; examples for common disputes.

Compatible agents

Designed for agent platforms that support long-form procedural skills and tooling integrations (Claude Code / Claude Agent SDK, similar LLM agent runtimes).